Skip to content
CapRadio

CapRadio

signal status listen live donate
listen live donate signal status
listen live donate signal status
  • News
    • topics
    • State Government
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • Race and Equity
    • Business
    • Arts and Lifestyle
    • Food and Sustainability
    • PolitiFact California
  • Music
    • genres
    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Eclectic
    • Daily Playlist
  • Programs + Podcasts
    • news
    • Morning Edition
    • All Things Considered
    • Marketplace
    • Insight With Vicki Gonzalez
    • music
    • Acid Jazz
    • At the Opera
    • Classical Music
    • Connections
    • Excellence in Jazz
    • Hey, Listen!
    • K-ZAP on CapRadio
    • Mick Martin's Blues Party
    • Programs A-Z
    • Podcast Directory
  • Schedules
    • News
    • Music
    • ClassicalStream
    • JazzStream
    • Weekly Schedule
    • Daily Playlist
  • Community
    • Events Calendar
    • CapRadio Garden
    • CapRadio Reads
    • Ticket Giveaways
  • Support
    • Evergreen Gift
    • One-Time Gift
    • Corporate Support
    • Vehicle Donation
    • Stock Gift
    • Legacy Gift
    • Endowment Gift
    • Benefits
    • Member FAQ
    • e‑Newsletter
    • Drawing Winners
    • Thank You Gifts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Close Menu
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 
 We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter 
  • Health Care
  •  

Battle Over Pesticide Pits Demand For Proof Against Precautions For Health

  •  Ali Budner 
Monday, August 14, 2017 | Sacramento, CA
Listen
/
Update RequiredTo play audio, update browser or Flash plugin.
Ali Budner / Capital Public Radio

Claudia Angulo stands with her four children outside their home in Orange Cove, California. Angulo says her son Isaac was exposed to toxic levels of the pesticide chlorpyrifos while she was pregnant with him.

Ali Budner / Capital Public Radio

Claudia Angulo and her four children live in Orange Cove, California, a corner of Fresno County known for its citrus. She says when planes fly over the orange grove next to their apartment building and spray pesticides on the trees, she and her family experience headaches, exhaustion and difficulty breathing.

But Angulo is concerned about an even more serious health problem in her 11-year-old son Isaac. When she was pregnant with him, she worked at a packing house, handling freshly picked citrus. After Isaac was born, Angulo says she noticed his development seemed slow and strange. “I saw that he didn’t play the same as other kids,” she says. “He didn’t learn the same.”

She says his behavior was aggressive and antisocial. And she tells a story about the time he even threatened suicide — when he was only four years old. When he was five, a doctor diagnosed with him ADHD. Angulo says several other pregnant women she worked with at the packing house also had children who developed behavioral and attention problems.

So she started doing research online and came across possible connections between developmental problems in kids and the pesticide chlorpyrifos.

The chemical is manufactured by Dow AgroSciences. It has been used commercially as an insecticide since 1965 and is used on over 50 crops, including nuts, berries, apples, broccoli, wheat, soy and citrus.

Angulo became convinced Isaac’s exposure to chlorpyrifos in utero was to blame for his problems. So she joined a local activist group that was pushing for a ban and started speaking out.

But farmers, like Paul Wenger, who rely on chlorpyrifos to keep their crops from infestations, say the pesticide has gotten a bad rap. Wenger is a third generation farmer in Modesto and President of the California Farm Bureau. His main crops are almonds and walnuts.

081217 Paul Wenger PPaul Wenger is a farmer in Modesto and president of the California Farm Bureau. Ali Budner / Capital Public Radio

He says he doesn’t use chlorpyrifos often — in fact, he doesn’t even anticipate using it this year at all. But he still sees it as an important tool. “If all of a sudden we had a bunch of moths come in and lay their eggs,” he says, “and we see little worms that can jump right into a marketable nut. You bet. We'll spray chlorpyrifos.”

He can’t make a profit on wormy walnuts, and he says there’s nothing that takes care of them in a pinch like chlorpyrifos. Plus, Wenger believes the pesticide is safe. He raised his kids around it, and he says they’re all fine.

But controversy over the safety of chlorpyrifos has been going on for more than a decade. In the year 2000, because of growing health concerns based on evidence from animal studies, the Environmental Protection Agency eliminated the use of chlorpyrifos by homeowners. Then throughout the  2000s, three separate research groups published a series of human epidemiology studies showing a variety of associations between chlorpyrifos (or organophosphates, the family of chemicals that includes chlorpyrifos) and neurodevelopmental problems in children who were exposed in utero.

So in 2007, environmental groups like Pesticide Action Network and the Natural Resources Defense Council started putting legal pressure on the EPA to consider banning chlorpyrifos altogether. And in 2015, a panel of EPA scientists finally did issue a recommendation for a full ban.

But this spring, before the ban could be finalized and implemented, Trump’s EPA chief, Scott Pruitt, decided to reject the former administration’s decision and halted the ban, calling for a return to “sound science.”

So what does the science say? It’s broadly accepted that chlorpyrifos is toxic to the nervous system. That’s how it kills bugs and that’s how it affects humans — at high levels of exposure.

But what the human epidemiology studies suggest is it may be dangerous even at low levels, especially for the developing brains of babies and children. Columbia University researchers found that “children who were exposed prenatally to the insecticide chlorpyrifos had significantly poorer mental and motor development by three years of age and increased risk for behavior problems.” And later iterations of the study, with the same subjects, found memory problems and decreased IQ in the children.

The sample size in the Columbia study was relatively small (265 children) and the results have yet to be replicated.

“This is not perfect science,” says UC Berkeley’s Brenda Eskenazi, lead researcher on another of the three organophosphate studies. She says more research is needed. But right now she doesn’t think chlorpyrifos can meet the EPA’s standard for “a reasonable certainty of no harm.”

081217 Brenda Eskenazi PBrenda Eskenazi, a researcher at UC Berkeley, says that more research is needed to know for sure if chlorpyrifos is dangerous to humans at low levels -- but for now, she doesn't think it meets the EPA's standard for “a reasonable certainty of no harm.” Ali Budner / Capital Public Radio

Eskenazi thinks one of the reasons health advocates and environmental groups are fighting Scott Pruitt’s decision so passionately is they see it as the administration’s war on facts. “I think we’re seeing partially a rebellion,” she says “about you know facts as fake facts and science not being real and that this is just like the test case, the canary in a way.”

She says there’s “sound research” in animal data that supports that chlorpyrifos has the potential to hurt human health. “I think we have to weigh the animal evidence and the limited human evidence together,” she says, “to make sure we anticipate any potential harm to human health and to guard against that.”

But former Dow epidemiologist Carol Burns says the human evidence is too limited to draw any conclusions around cause and effect between chlorpyrifos and health problems in kids. She says Dow’s research shows the pesticide is completely safe at legal levels and that a governmental ban would be unjustified.

“Chlorpyrifos and other insecticides,” she adds, “allow us as a society to have a cheap supply of fruits and vegetables.”

So the question remains — should government officials err on the side of caution, at the possible expense of people who rely on chlorpyrifos?

This is far from the end of the regulatory story. California Senator Kamala Harris and seven other lawmakers have introduced a bill in the US Senate that would ban chlorpyrifos and calls for more research on organophosphates in general. Seven Attorneys General, including California’s Xavier Becerra, filed an objection, challenging Scott Pruitt’s order “as a violation of the Food Act because it leaves current food tolerances for chlorpyrifos in effect without finding that they are safe.” Environmental advocacy groups are suing the EPA over chlorpyrifos for the sixth time now in ten years. And California is considering whether to put new restrictions on the chemical at the state level.  


Follow us for more stories like this

CapRadio provides a trusted source of news because of you.  As a nonprofit organization, donations from people like you sustain the journalism that allows us to discover stories that are important to our audience. If you believe in what we do and support our mission, please donate today.

Donate Today  

    Related Stories

  • Gosia Wozniacka / AP

    Cal EPA Moves Toward Tighter Pesticide Restrictions

    Friday, August 18, 2017
    The state Department of Pesticide Regulations Friday released their newest risk assessment for a commonly used pesticide called chlorpyrifos.

 healthcarepesticides

Ali Budner

Reporter

Ali Budner is an award-winning independent journalist based in Oakland, California. She reports on health, food, ecology, immigration, and the arts.   Read Full Bio 

Coronavirus Newsletter

Get answers to your questions, the latest updates and easy access to the resources you need, delivered to your inbox.

 

Want to know what to expect? Here's a recent newsletter.

Thanks for subscribing!

We'll send you weekly emails so you can stay informed about the coronavirus in California.

Browse all newsletters

More Health Care Stories

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

The federal government is offering another round of free COVID tests

May 16, 2022

Scott Olson/Getty Images

FDA authorizes first COVID booster for children ages 5 to 11

May 17, 2022

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File

Sacramento-area schools seeing rise in COVID-19 cases, but don’t plan to require masks again

May 17, 2022

Most Viewed

Eva, the hero dog, beats back a mountain lion that attacked her owner on a hike

Top California Democrats in a stalemate over gas rebates

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla will appear on California’s June primary ballot twice. Here’s why.

Downtown Sacramento shooting: What we know and latest updates

California coronavirus updates: Nevada ends COVID-19 emergency declarations

We Get Support From:
Become a Supporter

Most Viewed

Eva, the hero dog, beats back a mountain lion that attacked her owner on a hike

Top California Democrats in a stalemate over gas rebates

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla will appear on California’s June primary ballot twice. Here’s why.

Downtown Sacramento shooting: What we know and latest updates

California coronavirus updates: Nevada ends COVID-19 emergency declarations

Back to Top

  • CapRadio

    7055 Folsom Boulevard
    Sacramento, CA 95826-2625

    • (916) 278-8900
    • Toll-free (877) 480-5900
    • Email Us
    • Submit a News Tip
  • Contact Us

  • About Us

    • Contact Us / Feedback
    • Coverage
    • Directions
    • Careers & Internships
    • Mission / Vision / Core Values
    • Press
    • Staff Directory
    • Board of Directors
  • Listening Options

    • Mobile App
    • On Air Schedules
    • Smart Speakers
    • Playlist
    • Podcasts
    • RSS
  • Connect With Us

    •  Facebook
    •  Twitter
    •  Instagram
    •  YouTube
  • Donate

  • Listen

  • Newsletters

CapRadio stations are licensed to California State University, Sacramento. © 2022, Capital Public Radio. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Website Feedback FCC Public Files: KXJZ KKTO KUOP KQNC KXPR KXSR KXJS. For assistance accessing our public files, please call 916-278-8900 or email us.